321C - Ciel the Commander¶
- Title:
Ciel the Commander - Judge / source:
Codeforces - Original URL: https://codeforces.com/problemset/problem/321/C
- Secondary topics:
Centroid decomposition,Centroid tree,Balanced recursive labeling - Difficulty:
hard - Subtype:
Build the centroid decomposition tree itself and label nodes by centroid depth - Status:
solved - Solution file: cielthecommander.cpp
Why Practice This¶
This is the cleanest in-repo anchor for trusting the centroid decomposition structure itself.
The problem does not hide behind a second data structure or a later query trick.
It asks for a labeling whose proof is exactly the decomposition:
- choose one balanced centroid
- give it the highest available rank
- recurse on the remaining components
So the real lesson is:
- how to find a centroid repeatedly
- how the centroid tree is built
- why nodes with the same centroid depth automatically satisfy the path rule
Recognition Cue¶
Reach for centroid decomposition when:
- the tree is static
- the statement wants a balanced recursive partition
- or every solution argument sounds like “pick one central node, solve paths through it, recurse on the rest”
The strong smell here is:
- if two nodes share the same rank, some higher-ranked node must lie on their path
That is exactly what centroid levels provide.
Problem-Specific Transformation¶
Let the rank of a node be determined by its depth in the centroid tree:
- root centroid ->
A - its centroid-tree children ->
B - next level ->
C - and so on
Then if two nodes x and y receive the same rank, they lie in different child components of some higher centroid chosen earlier.
So the unique path between x and y passes through that earlier centroid, which has a strictly higher rank.
That matches the statement directly.
Core Idea¶
Build the centroid decomposition tree of the original tree.
For each recursive component:
- find its centroid
c - label
cwith the current letter - remove
c - recurse on every remaining component with the next letter
Why is the labeling valid?
Because equal letters correspond to equal centroid-tree depth.
Two nodes at the same centroid depth were separated earlier by some ancestor centroid with a smaller depth, hence a higher rank.
Therefore the path between them contains a higher-ranked node.
This is one of the rare problems where the centroid decomposition is not just a helper.
It is the whole proof.
Complexity¶
- each decomposition level touches every live node once
- centroid-tree depth is
O(log n) - total time:
O(n log n) - memory:
O(n)
This is easily fast enough for n <= 10^5.
Pitfalls / Judge Notes¶
- The rank depends on centroid depth, not ordinary tree depth.
- Do not confuse the centroid tree with the original tree.
- Using a
removed[]array is safer than erasing edges from adjacency lists. - In this constraint range, centroid depth stays well below
26, so a valid labeling exists.
Reusable Pattern¶
- Topic page: Centroid Decomposition
- Practice ladder: Centroid Decomposition ladder
- Starter template: centroid-decomposition.cpp
- Notebook refresher: Centroid hot sheet
- Compare points: Trees, Euler Tour / Subtree Queries, Heavy-Light Decomposition
- This note adds: the direct “build the centroid tree and use its depth as the answer” pattern.
Solutions¶
- Code: cielthecommander.cpp